Othello, By William Shakespeare - 1288 Words

How much is too much We can see, Othello serving as an example to demonstrate the expectations of a woman in the society, the practice of privileges in male-controlled marriages, and the suppression and restriction of femininity throughout the play. According to Shakespeare s society built upon beliefs, women were meant only to be married. As their only occupation, marriage held massive responsibilities of house management and child nurturing. Additionally, women were expected to be silent, untainted, and obedient to their husbands, and all men in general. In our societies women s subordination is the natural order because women were thought to be physiologically and psychologically inferior to men. As we go through Othello we find†¦show more content†¦Desdemona is primarily considered an innocent victim of her fate, just as her name means ill-fated. We see that she herself did not want to die at the hands of her beloved husband she begged him to kill her the following day (act5.2.100). She was loving and devoted to Othello and envisioned a long marriage of prosperity and dedication that would lead to her ultimate happiness. She had achieved what is supposedly the essence of a woman’s role, she had found a husband who she could love with all her being. She reflected that through her actions and dialogue throughout the play. She could not have possibly believed that anything that she did or said would have caused her loving husband to turn on her so viciously. If responsibility has to be assigned to an individual, surely she should be forgiven since one could not understand that she could intentionally initiate any course that would lead to her death and the end of her relationship with Othello. Othello had a perception of Desdemona that was altered by the conspiracies of Iago. Desdemona contributed to that perception by fulfilling a role that she thought was ideal for Othello. She wanted to be Othello’s perfect woman, so she portrayed herself as pure to her husband. She was not guilty of wrong doing in her portrayal since she was pure. Her excessive efforts to remain pure in Othello’s eyes caused her to appear the exact opposite of how she wanted to be regarded by him. Rather than see her as the pure

Why was Hitler able to dominate Germany by 1934 Free Essays

The S. A. was, essentially, the private army of the NSDAP. We will write a custom essay sample on Why was Hitler able to dominate Germany by 1934? or any similar topic only for you Order Now During the years of endemic violence in Germany after its defeat in the First World War until 1925, and again after 1930, after the prosperity brought by the Young plan evaporated with the Wall Street Crash of October 1929, such private armies were commonplace, and indeed necessary. Many members of the S. A. had come out of the defeated German army, and were in effect mercenary thugs. The principal attraction of the S. A. to many of its members was not the political ideology of the party for which it worked (although a great many of them were probably Nazi sympathizers), but rather its pomp, regalia and display (the S. A. wore the uniform of the defeated German army, evoking patriotic spirit among both its members and the general public), which were used to great effect to boost party membership (indeed, this was one of the main aims of the S. A.) and to attract new sympathizers. The main job of the S. A. was to provide security for the Nazi party, particularly at its rallies, which could easily have been ruined with the presence of a few hardcore opposition supporters intent on causing damage to their political enemies; equally, the S. A. was designed to disrupt the meetings of opposition parties, and to attack (physically, rather than verbally) their politicians, and, particularly when the Nazis were in power, the Jews. The S. A. offered stability to its members, in a time at which unemployment was astronomically high; it also gave a sense of purpose to its more politically motivated members, who may well have felt that they were fighting for the good of the Fatherland. Indeed, the ideologies of members of the S. A. varied widely, from the nationalist conservatives in the army whose views verged on the fascist, to those with strong socialist sympathies, such as Rohm, the leader of the S. A. until the ‘Night of the Long Knives’ in June 1934. b. Explain the reasons why the Wall Street Crash was important to the success of the Nazis after 1929. The main effect of the Wall Street Crash of October 1929 on the politics of Germany was the polarization of political opinion that it caused. The Crash caused the United States to recall the loans that it had made to Germany (and to other European powers, although they were less badly affected than Germany because they owed less money to the US, as Germany was being rebuilt almost entirely with US money after the war), thus causing economic chaos. A banking crisis led to a sharp drop in spending, causing businesses to go bankrupt, and thus causing mass unemployment. The people that lost out the most were the middle classes, as the very rich had enough money that they could get by easily, and the poor were mostly agricultural workers, who could survive by subsistence farming and selling their goods, which were essential to everyone. Almost all of the more enthusiastic supporters of the democratic Weimar republic also came from the middle classes, and with the collapse in their way of life caused by the Wall Street Crash and subsequent financial crisis in Germany, the government inevitably shouldered much of the blame. With most of the government’s support having evaporated, people inevitably looked to alternative systems of rule – principally those at almost diametrically opposite ends of the spectrum: the nationalist ultra-conservative Nazi party, who promised to sort out the country, and the Communists and Socialists (Russia had been unaffected by the Wall Street Crash, owing to the fact that private ownership of land – and thus the mortgages upon which people in Germany had to default – was forbidden). It is worth remembering that the Nazi party was not the only party to which people turned in the times of hardship after the Wall Street Crash. While the support for Weimar universally collapsed, both the Communists and Nazis gained seats in the September 1930 Reichstag elections (although the Nazis did so in far greater quantity – their number of seats rose by 983% in the elections, as opposed to the Communists’ relatively meagre forty-three percent rise). However, it is certain that this huge rise in popularity was caused, for the most part, by the middle classes deserting Weimar, and giving their support to the Nazi Party, which was, after all, far more respectable than the Communist Party. So convinced were many industrialists (notably the Thyssen and Schnitzler families) by Hitler’s anti-communist promises that they gave large sums of money to the Nazi party, a fact which demonstrates the respect given to the Nazi Party by many people held in high regard. While the Wall Street Crash was a principal factor in the rise of the Nazi party, it was by no means the only one. The death in October 1929 of Gustav Stresemann, the extremely able Chancellor, struck another blow to the Weimar government, contributing to its loss of popular confidence. He was succeeded by Brunning, who imposed a rigorous economic policy of cuts, enforced by presidential decree from the aging von Hindenburg, which, although they may have been a possible solution to the economic problems of Germany, were deeply unpopular, and meant that still fewer middle class people supported the democratic system of government. His foreign policy, however, was remarkably similar to Hitler’s – he talked of remilitarizing the Rhineland, and even of Anschluss with Austria. The blaming of the Communists and consequent elimination of opposition in the next elections after the Reichstag fire was also an extremely important factor in the NSDAP’s gaining a majority in the Reichstag and thus eventual power, with Hitler as Chancellor. The Wall Street Crash was thus important to the rise of the Nazi party after 1929 because it resulted in an economic crisis in Germany, which precipitated a loss of confidence in the Weimar government from the middle classes. The hard times in Germany led to political polarization, and, while the Nazis were not the only beneficiaries of this, they certainly received a boost in their levels of support. However, it was not the only reason for their rise to power – the Reichstag fire and thus the elimination of opposition to the Nazi party, and before that, the death of Stresemann, both contributed to the NSDAP’s rise to power. How to cite Why was Hitler able to dominate Germany by 1934?, Papers

Theory and Practice of Change Management

Question: Discuss about the Theory and Practice of Change Management. Answer: Introduction: Communication plays an important role in establishing a successful communication between the employer and the employees of an organization, and while any kind of organizational change is being introduced, the transparent flow of information between the two ends is absolutely needed. In the year of 2006, when the CEO of Sun Microsystems, was changed, not many employees were prepared to accept an existent employee in a new role, and hence Jonathon Schwartz, the new CEO had to adopt a suitable communication strategy. As per the KAA model, awareness and acceptance are the two change phases that fit best the communication strategy adopted by Schwartz. As it can be seen, Schwartz instead of imposing change on the employees, and establishing his authority, Schwartz chose to engage his subordinates, in the process of designing an implementation strategy. He listened to the people, informed them about his decision and plans, created awareness among them about the new responsibilities, and the new plans he has formulated. Further, Schwartz also employed blogging as an effective means for communicating with the employees of Sun Microsystems that helped the employees accept him. While interacting with the employees, Schwartz succeeded in establishing a close bond with his subordinates, as a result of which he could not only introduce the changes to the employees, but could easily help the employees handle the transition (Hayes 2014). Instead of mandating change, Schwartz was discreet enough to change the employee mindset and attitude, by holding interactive sessions and regular meetings with the employees. This two way method of communication helps in gaining the confidence of the subordinates, thereby helping them to accept the leadership style of Schwartz (Cornelissen 2014). It has been understood that although Schwartz had adopted an effective communication strategy for communicating the change to the employees, a few more suggestions could be beneficial here. The moment a change is happening in an organization, the employees usually have one question in mind, and that is why the change is happening at all. Although, Schwartz has devoted sufficient time for communicating with the employees, he has focused much on the cause of introducing a sudden change in the organization. Unless the employees are aware of the purpose of the change, as well as their own benefits out of the proposed change, they will never embrace the change, and work towards the same ( Dozier et al. 2013). Further, it is also highly important to keep on re-iterating the motive, as well as the ultimate benefits of the change before the employees, so that they can easily accept the change, and work towards it. Apart from the regular interactive sessions, and meetings, it is also important to communicate the need of change, via general meetings, on-on-one conversation, presentations, brainstorming workshops, screen saver messages, and many more. It should be also remembered, that it is not just sufficient to communicate the need and purpose of change to the employees, it is equally important to know if the encoded message is successfully decoded by the employees or not. It may happen that few of the employees could not interpret the value of the proposed change in a proper way, or some of them are dissuaded by a few non-cooperative employees. Hence it is imperative to employ assessment tools, that will help in understanding whether the message communicated is properly interpreted and decoded by the employee or not (Hrebiniak et al. 2013). Reference List: Cornelissen, J., 2014.Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Sage. Dozier, D.M., Grunig, L.A. and Grunig, J.E., 2013.Manager's guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Routledge. Hayes, J., 2014.The theory and practice of change management. Palgrave Macmillan. Hrebiniak, L.G., 2013.Making strategy work: Leading effective execution and change. FT Press.